In the Matter of PMC PANEL
MEETING
July 26, 2007
Commissioners Ghan and Whitworth
participated in a meeting of the PMC Citizens Panel. Commissioner Ghan
opened the meeting at 4:05 p.m. Panel members present were Lela Liggins,
Bob Chandler, Dorsey Hill, Mayor
Lupica said the panel was formed as an outreach move. It’s first
phase of gathering information has been occurring which now gets used in some
practical process fact based. Lupica said the Commissioners have duties
imposed upon them to make decisions by vote. He suggested you must think
before you vote and said the Commissioners could just vote, or they could
analyze, get facts, see what community members of all walks of life have to say
about this county property and then make a decision. This is a very public
process. Lupica said most things the county does with Stroudwater is
done under the clock of attorney client privilege but the community is
involved. Lupica said Strouwater will depend on the panel to help
refine information.
Peel said after a few community interviews they have been having you start
seeing a thread of concerns as to what those folks interviewed want to
see. There may be a different perspective but you get a pretty good
composite of what the community wants, needs or desires to see in their
hospital. He said they have done a lot of listening and now begin
the process of put that information into some organized fashion for the
Commissioners would like to see working together with the panel to see what the
process is.
Lupica gave a presentation of this process
considering:
COMMUNITY AGENDA
The Community’s Treasure
What do you want to accomplish?
Respect the small-city atmosphere and quality of
life.
Clinical excellence
Delivered on an attractive campus
Support ISU’s medical education objectives
Provide accessible and affordable quality health care to
all
Hospital of choice for professionals and
their patients throughout the region
STATED VISION OF VALUES
Vision for single campus regional referral
center with well-defined centers of excellence
Compassion
Dignity
Excellence
Education
Accountability
Collaboration
COMMUNITY AGENDA
CONTENTS
Community
Two duties
Guiding
principles
Process
Community
VALUES COME FIRST
Community values
Become objectives
And objectives drive the outcome
COMMISSIONERS DUTIES
State’s constitution and statutory framework
Imposes Decision-Making duties on Commissioners and potentially on the
voters
Duty to Vote includes duty to
deliberate
Listen
Investigate and analyze options
Ask pointed questions
Debate
Then vote
Weeg asked how we tie this all into timing? Do we
stop construction? Lupica said we do have to consider those impacts.
Everyone is very cognizant for the need for speed. We are making a hundred
year decision. How long will it take to get the right answer. The
request for information issue must be addressed.
Listen to your hopes, wants and
needs
Articulate the values and objectives of the citizens of
Independently verify the feasibility of capital
plans
Ask citizen based questions to those who seek privilege
of serving the people of
Deliberate and vote with real options on the
table
Advocate for the people of
EVOLVING ROLE OF CITIZENS
PANEL
Initial role; gather
information
The panel has gathered valuable public testimony
On community objectives and potential models
CONTINUING ROLE; Report and review
Refine results of testimony and listening sessions
Create community based guidelines
Help Commissioners and Prosecutor draft pointed questions for interested parties
Dorsey said she felt like they did not have all the
answers, especially the financials.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Options are . . . optional!
Process is important
Sequencing: Ideas first, then conclusions
Honest thoughtful people can disagree so assume all are acting in good
faith
If good will could build a new hospital we’d have one by
now.
Its about what we all want
ANALYTICAL PROCESS
Fair
Fact based
Research driven
Focus on long term results
PUBLIC DECISION PROCESS
Why the Commissioners have established this
process:
They have accepted their duty
To deliberate
Foster public debate
To make a decision
They demand a fact based analysis
They want to listen to citizens
They need to examine options and ask
questions
Process supports framework of constitutional duty and
law
PUBLIC DECISION PROCESS
Trust the process
Deliberate
Participate
Independently
assessed
Honest and
principled
PROCESS CHART
Clarity of leadership
Stakeholder values
Physician/citizen
input
research
Community
questions
verify capital plan
Assess option
Bond market
financing
capital partner financing/resources
Transfer of
ownership
Transfer of ownership
Debt
capacity
local or national partner
Timing
other affiliation structures
And After all
It is the community’s
treasure
And what do we want to
accomplish
A healthy future
Evans asked about the request for financial information
from the hospital. The Commissioners said they have been working with the
hospital for the past few weeks to get the information. Evans asked
if the information could be given to the Commissioners but not the public.
Ghan said they are trying to stay within the laws of public records disclosure
and get the information necessary and use it honestly and properly to make the
decision. Lupica said he is in the business to know what is
proprietary and what should not be public knowledge and there are state laws
regarding this issue. The county is requesting financial information,
statistical information to make a public presentation for their findings and
analysis. Ghan said a list of information has been developed with the
Commissioners, Stroudwater and the county attorney and some information has been
received but we are working to get the rest of the information. Dial
asked if the option to govern is chosen that the hospital will be run by a broad
base board of community citizens would they run into the same problem with the
hospital giving only the information they deem to give. Who would help
that board of community people get information when the
Meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m.